BEIJING — Envoys of the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of the Tibetans, arrived in China on Tuesday to resume a long-running series of negotiations over Tibet that have so far been fruitless.
The current set of negotiations will be the ninth since 2002 between
the Dalai Lama, whom China accuses of being a dangerous “splittist,”
and the Chinese government, which has flooded large areas of Tibetan
regions in western China with security forces since a widespread uprising there in March 2008.
The Dalai Lama, 74, who lives in exile in the Indian hill town of
Dharamsala, says he does not want independence for Tibetan regions, but
rather greater autonomy — the Tibetans should be able to make their own
policy regarding religious practice, education and immigration
to the regions, he says. Tibetans are anxious over the large numbers of
ethnic Han, who dominate most of China, moving to the Tibetan plateau
to seek their fortunes.
The series of negotiations between the Dalai Lama and China broke
down in November 2008, after Chinese officials strongly rejected a
proposal for genuine autonomy presented to them. During the eighth
round of talks, the two envoys who handed over that proposal were Lodi
G. Gyari, from Washington, and Kelsang Gyaltsen, of Switzerland. Both
are representing the Dalai Lama again in this round.
The envoys will return to India in early February, the Tibetan government-in-exile said in a statement on its Web site.
The United Front Work Department, the part of the Chinese Communist
Party that officially deals with ethnic policy, said in a written
statement on Tuesday: “We hope the Dalai Lama side will cherish this
opportunity and eagerly respond to the demands by the central
government.”
Tibet remains one of the most delicate issues between China and the United States. President Obama
has said he will meet with the Dalai Lama early this year. Last fall,
Mr. Obama declined to meet with the Dalai Lama while the Dalai Lama was
visiting the United States. The move was widely seen as an attempt by
Mr. Obama to improve United States-China relations, but Chinese leaders
continued to press the president on Tibet during his first state visit
to China in November. State Department officials quickly abandoned a
new phrase that had been coined to describe the conciliatory approach —
“strategic reassurance” — and which had been criticized by some
Americans as being tantamount to appeasement.
Late Monday, the State Department said it welcomed the latest round of negotiations between the Dalai Lama and China.
“The United States strongly supports dialogue between China and the
Dalai Lama’s representatives to address longstanding differences,” said
Philip Crowley, a State Department spokesman, in a written statement.
“The administration hopes this meeting will produce positive results
and provide a foundation for future discussions to resolve outstanding
issues.”
Though Tibetans uniformly revere the Dalai Lama, there are many,
especially younger ones, who criticize the Dalai Lama’s approach to
China. They say that the Tibetan exile movement should be seeking
independence for Tibet, not accommodation under Chinese rule. The
Chinese government has no intention of giving ground, they say, and is
just using the series of negotiations to stall for time until the Dalai
Lama dies.
“Until we see visible change on the ground in Tibet and some real
give-and-take on the part of the Chinese government, we can be
confident that the resumption of the dialogue is nothing more than a
delaying tactic designed to mute international criticism, especially in
the lead up to the expected meeting between Obama and the Dalai Lama,”
said Tenzin Dorjee, executive director of Students for a Free Tibet, a group based in New York that advocates for Tibetan independence.
The Dalai Lama’s spokesman, Tenzin Taklha, said Monday that the
talks were part of an “important process of trying to find a mutually
agreed solution,” according to Agence France-Presse.
Last week, China’s top leaders met to draw up plans for governing
Tibet. State news organizations said the leaders determined that
continued economic development would bring “stability” to the region.
Xiyun Yang contributed research.
|